Diff between current and proposal list: - incident - question - cli::tshark + ui::tshark - ui::gtk - version::0.x - version::1.0 - version::1.10 - version::1.12 - version::1.2 - version::1.4 - version::1.6 - version::1.8 - version::2.0 - version::2.2 - version::2.4 - version::2.6 - version::3.0 + version::outdated + ws-status::unconfirmed + ws-status::confirmed + ws-status::waiting-for-response + ws-status::in-progress + ws-status::invalid + ws-status::wontfix + ws-status::fixed + ws-status::duplicate
I have no strong feelings about the os::* labels. We can reduce them to os::mac, os::windows, os::linux, os::unix. Am 26.04.21 um 23:13 schrieb Roland Knall: > The list seems to be duplicated with the lists from above. Anyhow, it seems > we just have too many labels already, and I > am still not convinced that they can be used properly and consistently at > this point > > I would clean up the proposal list first, then from there figure out which > items we need on the list > > cheers > Roladn ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe