On Jun 22, 2021, at 6:33 PM, Vincent Randal <vtran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are using PER per the foo example (Simple ASN.1-based dissector). Wow, I > never about all these different encodings. > > Maybe we should be using something other than PER? We think we like PER > because the dissected values agree with what we can see in the raw UDP data. You should be using whatever encoding the protocol is using. Is this a protocol for which you have an ASN.1 specification plus an indication of the encoding being used, or is this something you're reverse-engineering? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
