See https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/4178 for the
functionality change

Am Mo., 13. Sept. 2021 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com>:

> Looks to me that we actually have an inconsistency in behavior. If you
> click on a byte, the underlying field gets selected in the byteview as well
> as packetdetail pane and stays selected, until you click someplace else. If
> you do the same the other way around, it does not work, as the selection is
> not locked in in the byteview.
>
> Bugfix inbound, and I don't think it needs to be configurable, as it
> actually solves the underlying issue
>
> cheers
> Roland
>
> Am Sa., 11. Sept. 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb John Thacker <
> johnthac...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 7:23 AM Jaap Keuter <jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Often when working with captured data from some development setup I
>>> wonder around the packet bytes with the mouse pointer to try and follow
>>> where in the code under development certain parts of a packet contents is
>>> being created. What happens now is that the highlighting of the field where
>>> this particular bytes are from follows the mouse pointer. But I'm working
>>> the other way around, by first selecting a field in the packet details,
>>> then dive into the packet bytes, where I would like the selected field
>>> highlighting to remain, so I can navigate around while keeping my bearings
>>> in the packet.
>>>
>>> But I recon this will upset people. So putting it behind a preference
>>> would a the way to go. The the question becomes where to put that? Anyone a
>>> good idea?
>>>
>>
>> I would appreciate that, I have wished for that behavior myself. While
>> one option is just giving it a name so that people can only access it
>> through Preferences->Advanced, I think the most natural place is in
>> Appearance->Layout. There's already a section for Packet List settings
>> there, that includes a preference for "Enable mouse-over colorization." (
>> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/blob/master/epan/prefs.c#L3377-L3380)
>> Perhaps add a "Packet Bytes settings" group and then the new preference.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> John Thacker
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to