I think it is reasonable to assume that libraries provided with the project
are being used by external programs. I know one utility which is being used
in a rather closed-off community (but nonetheless widely adopted by around
200-300 people), which got broken by this. Their solution is to stay on 3.4
until either 3.6 is fixed or the utility (which probably will be done in
this case).

I also think it is the right thinking to allow libraries and more
specifically ABI breaks between releases. But those should never occur in a
maintenance release, which is what happened here if I got the gist of it.
If the break would be between 3.4.x and 3.6.0 it would be fine by me. But
breaking between 3.6.0 and 3.6.1 should not happen. I consider this an
issue that must be fixed - but the change should most certainly happen with
a version beyond 3.6.

And just additionally my 2 cents. Please always consider that although the
download rates of Wireshark are mind-blowing and wonderful, the adoption
within companies might be even greater with special build versions. There
exists many reasons for those versions, be it not enough resources
available to bring changes to mainline or having code and adaptations which
are for whatever (legal mostly) reasons not able to be publicly available.
Changes like these i would see as a risk to those practices, and one of the
reasons Wireshark has such a good standing within the community are our
policies for long-time stability and maintainability.

Just my own thoughts on this.
cheers
Roland

Am Do., 20. Jan. 2022 um 13:42 Uhr schrieb Bálint Réczey <
bal...@balintreczey.hu>:

> Hi All,
>
> João shared his opinion about the project's commitment to maintain
> stable shared library ABI within stable branches:
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/17822
>
> I believe the current practice is reasonable and beneficial enough for
> many parties to warrant the work, but I could be wrong.
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> Cheers,
> Balint
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to