Hi, I have checked the pull request and saw that it was merged into master one month ago... I shall eventually compile wireshark from master and test it with _very large_ pcaps containing lots of SCTP associations :-) I'll let you know.
Thanks a lot, Cristian On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 4:45 AM John Thacker <johnthac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 3:32 AM Cristian Constantin via Wireshark-dev > <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Jeff, >> >> Yes, after enabling the respective protocol decoding option, SCTP >> association analysis works. >> SCTP association analysis is _quite_ slow, though. I'll check why it >> is so slow when I have some spare time. > > > If you have some time, can you see if > https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/13786 > works for you and if it's faster (at least the dissection part, this doesn't > affect the tapping)? It works > on my samples, and it uses hashmaps instead of lists so it should be better > on large files. > > Thanks, > John > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
