ronnie, You should take a look at this capture. These out-if-order packets look to me more like retransmissions.
L, It appears that 192.168.70.42 transmits twice every TCP packet. What's the cause I can't tell but that's certainly a problem of that box. Try disabling the firewall if you have it and see if it still happens. On 1/12/07, L SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is the capture from the PC I am having so many out of order packets > from. If anyone is kin enough to take a peak and maybe save my sanity, I > would be forever grateful. > > As you can see it is happening with multiple destinations. > > I have ruled out faulty nics, the network connection and even the PC itself > (swapped the harddrive into a new machine). > > My only other step is to just reformat the PC??? > > > >From: "L SB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Community support list for Wireshark > ><wireshark-users@wireshark.org> > >To: wireshark-users@wireshark.org > >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP out of order segments > >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:04:29 -0500 > > > >I did some more testing and it is only happening on one PC. I have tried > >changing network cards and even the motherboad and a new network > >connection. > >At this point, it seems to be software related. Do you think LANMAN could > >cause this flood of out of segment packets? > > > > > > >From: "Frank Bulk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Community support list for Wireshark > > ><wireshark-users@wireshark.org> > > >To: "'Community support list for Wireshark'" > > ><wireshark-users@wireshark.org> > > >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP out of order segments > > >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:41:04 -0600 > > > > > >You'll want to do a packet trace of the transmitting computer and see if > > >they're being sent out on an orderly basis. > > > > > >Frank > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen > >Fisher > > >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:50 AM > > >To: Community support list for Wireshark > > >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP out of order segments > > > > > >On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:10:46AM -0500, L SB wrote: > > > > > > > Would asymmetric routing be a problem if the machines exist on the > > > > same subnet? > > > > > >No, since there is no routing going on there. > > > > > > > > >Steve > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Wireshark-users mailing list > > >Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > > >http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Wireshark-users mailing list > > >Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > > >http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >From photos to predictions, The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes > >has > >it all. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline1 > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Wireshark-users mailing list > >Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > >http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > _________________________________________________________________ > Fixing up the home? Live Search can help > http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users