Small, James wrote: > Anyway, could be a useful Wireshark feature - if you agree let me know > and I'll put it on the wish list.
What would be nice would be a language to describe a packet format and an interpreter for the language, so that a non-programmer could add a dissector for simpler protocols. Even if you just know that there's a 34-byte header, and don't know its contents, you could describe the header as a 34-byte opaque blob. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
