Sure? Nothing is sure, so maybe I shouldn't have said obviously. (grin) Actually I've had trouble setting this myself on a 3500 series switch, but the symptoms are classic - seeing just broadcast traffic is what you expect on an unmodified switch port. The second link is what I use to verify I get the syntax right.
Randy Grein Network Engineer 206-442-5329 Cell 206-947-8226 "Giles Coochey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/10/2007 07:58 AM Please respond to Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users@wireshark.org> To "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users@wireshark.org> cc Subject Re: [Wireshark-users] Understanding what I'm seeing > > Obviously the port monitoring is incorrect. Cisco does a great job of > being inconsistent across their product line (but don't tell that to the > layer 3 guys - most insist Cisco can do no wrong as an article of faith). Are you sure that the port monitoring is wrong for a 3560? Maybe I'm missing something. Giles _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users - ------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom this email is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this email and deleting this email from your computer. Nothing contained in this email or any attachment shall satisfy the requirements for contract formation or constitute an electronic signature. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
