I received it! I think most people have moved to an online forum-I forget the details, but perhaps someone else can chime in with them for us? Thanks! :)
> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:35 AM, L A Walsh <wiresh...@tlinx.org> wrote: > > (Sorry for duplicates if there are any) > Usually I see a copy of my email come back to me when I send > an email to a list, but have seen nothing back from the list. > I verified my list options, and it seems there might be one > that could cause suppression depending on definintions, so I > toggled it to see if that makes a difference. > > Thank-you for your forbearance. > > > I was looking to understand the Round Trip Time graph and why it > > seems to jump up and down between near 0 and 270ms. That doesn't make > sense to me -- first I don't see how some of them would have an > RTT time of near 0 -- I don't see how that would be possible, so > I figure I don't understand how to read the graph. > > Also, I don't see why the RTT would jump up and down and why there > are "gaps" in the graph like between 45-85 seconds, vs. almost a > solid-like appearance between 380-410s. > Here is the RTT and througput graphs I'm trying to decipher: > > https://i.imgur.com/4ijLxTJ.jpg > > It looks like I have a relatively low latency when the graph > peaks at around 150ms, but then something causes a jump so that > latency climbs to over 250ms. > > It also seems to be the case where I'm getting low latency that > my throughput peaks with average packet length falling from 1500 > down to <100bytes. > > I don't see any clear errors. or why there is such a sudden drop > > Should I be looking for some type of dropped packets or errors? > > Could this be cause by my ISP cutting bandwidth in a step-wise > manner as a means to control? Or could this be some sort of > buffer-bloat with some buffer filling up and something halting > output to wait for some buffers to drain...?? > > Another possibility is the application on my end is running on a > high speed internal net with a 9k jumbo frame size -- could the > mismatch between that the external frame size of 1.5k be causing > some type of hysteresis? > > Any ideas on how, if it is possible I might even this out? > > It sorta wreaks havok with the local application... > > Thanks! > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe