Hello Koen,
Am Dienstag, den 09.12.2008, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Koen Deforche:
> Hey Goetz,
>
> 2008/12/8 Goetz Babin-Ebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the actual implementation of Wt::WMessageBox uses the
> > recursive event loop.
> >
> > Unfortunately this feature is not available without threads.
> >
> > Additionally the actual implementation has the disadvantage
> > that you have to guarantee that with N threads you have at
> > most N-1 WMessageBoxes open.
> >
> > Is it possible to
> > * change the WMessageBox to not use the recursive event loop or
> > * change the recursive event loop to stay in the same thread
> > (and not needing threads at all)
>
> WMessageBox does support the alternative usage, which does not require
> blocking a thread:
>
> {
> ...
> box_ = new WMessageBox(...);
> box_->show();
> box_->buttonClicked.connect(SLOT(box, WMessageBox::accept));
> box_->finished.connect(SLOT(this, MyWidget::handleBoxDone));
> }
>
> void MyWidget::handleBoxDone()
> {
> switch (box_->result()) {
> ...
> }
>
> delete box_;
> }
This cores.
Keeping the dialog in the handleBoxDone() succeeds,
but the next Dialog results in a new session...
Goetz
--
Goetz Babin-Ebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
4G Systems GmbH & Co KG
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
