Hi,

maybe you can use my stats for something:
At Mjølner, we are using Wt for web configuration and to monitor status in an 
embedded application (quite like the config pages on a router, but with 
continous application and communication status updates). The platform is a 
200MHz ARM9, which does a lot of other processing as well. Normal access 
pattern is 1 or 2 users at the same time. Application size is approx 5500 lines 
of C++.

The initial page load takes a while (5-15 seconds) but after that navigation 
and updates are fast like you would expect from an ajax application. Memory 
consumption peaks at 2.5 MB when running one session, probably because we 
create quite large tree structures.

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Michael Sørensen Loft, Mjølner Informatics A/S

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Koen Deforche [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 13. januar 2009 15:03
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Wt-interest] Performance or benchmarks available.
> 
> Hey,
> 
> 2009/1/10 Raindog <[email protected]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am interested in knowing whether or not there have been any 
> > published benchmarks or performance results that might be 
> compared to 
> > some other web platform?
> 
> Not published (that we know of). While we have profiled Wt 
> internally in order to optimize it so that it runs reasonably 
> even on a 200MHz ARM platform, we have never compared 
> performance with other solutions.
> 
> One obstacle for testing runtime performance is that the 
> test-bench needs to generate the right requests to simulate 
> events within a session, which is an internal affair in Wt as 
> opposed to traditional web application platforms. Wt needs to 
> become more test-bench friendly (not only for performance 
> testing, but also useful for correctness
> testing) and we have been considering several approaches to 
> tackle this, but have not yet planned the availability of 
> their implementation.
> 
> Testing memory usage, which is likely more of a scalability 
> constraint with Wt, is on the other hand rather straight 
> forward to measure, but will be very application-specific.
> 
> Regards,
> koen
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> witty-interest mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to