Koen, you rock! It's great to hear, that Wt grows. I just hope, that C++ wt will not die in a world of modern mainstreams such as Java and C#. We have couple of projects that use C++ wt, and we won't like to be left with wt on our own:-).
Koen Deforche пишет: > Hey all, > > We are pleased to announce two releases today. > > - The first one, wt-2.99.3, reflects ongoing improvements to Wt. > > This release contains mostly bug fixes and small feature enhancements > (see our release notes at > http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/doc/reference/html/Releasenotes.html) > > The most visible (and intrusive) change in this new release is a > simplified internal path API. Many among you have rightfully > complained that the current API was hard to deal with. The new API is > simpler in behavior (an internal path change results in the > internalPathChanged() signal being emitted, once) and reflects more > what one expects, and is much simpler to use. The API itself has not > changed, only the behavior. The new behavior is the default behavior, > but you can still revert to the old behavior by defining a property in > the configuration file (see the sample wt_config.xml file). > > - Our second release is jwt-2.99.3, the first public release of the > new Java cousin of C++ Wt. > > JWt is a native Java version doing (almost) exactly the same as Wt, > with a very similar API, but instead running in a Java Servlet > container. JWt and Wt are intimately related. In fact, they are pretty > much the same: the Java version is "built" from the C++ version, by > translating the original C++ code to idiomatic Java code (which was, > admittedly, great fun to make). Thus, JWt is not a set of bindings for > C++ Wt, but really a native version of Wt. The Java version has been > in development for some time now, and we have used it successfully in > several customer projects over the last year. > > The JWt website is at http://www.webtoolkit.eu/jwt > > So what does this mean for C++ Wt users? First of all, we are > absolutely committed to our C++ version, and all development will > happen on the C++ version (with the Java version only a 'make' away). > Secondly we believe that C++ users will indirectly benefit from its > Java offspring as it increases the number of users. In fact, many > recent improvements to C++ Wt have been driven by our Java projects. > > Enjoy! > > Regards, > koen > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > witty-interest mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest > > > -- Andrii Arsirii Streamco http://www.streamco.org.ua ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
