> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
My reading on the above indicates it says more of a "FSF has a problem in considering Apache not being compatible with GPL", while Apache guys are ok with it. They only mention GPL 2 as "gpl 2 has the same problem". Also they mention "unless lisensors of GPL software relax these restrictions (the ones making GPL incompatible with apache license" The incompatibility itself comes from some patent clauses of apache lisense (basically the you agree not to sue us) bits, etc, which I could not get my head around. So IMHO as authors of WT, you are absolutely ok with including log4cplus into WT, just add disclaimer that that that part is distributed under apache lisense, and you "wave" any gpl requirements that make it incompatible. There are tons of GPL lisensed projects that use log4j, and they have no problem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
