Correction to my fix:
if (scale_ == LinearScale)
resolution = fabs(1e-3 * segment.renderMinimum)
On Sep 18, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Joseph VanAndel wrote:
> Using Wt 3.2.2-p1:
>
> If I plot data that has the constant value of 2000.0, with scale_ =
> LinearScale,
> the assertion at the end of WAxis.C fails:
>
> assert (segment.renderMinimum < segment.renderMaximum)
>
> The problem appears to be in the calculation of 'resolution'.
> if (scale_ == LinearScale)
> resolution =1e3 * std::numeric_limits<double>::epsilon()
>
> since resolution has the value 2.2204460492503131e-13, it is too small to add
> or subtract to
>
> segment.renderMinimum
> or
> segment.renderMaximum
>
> to cause these two values to differ.
>
> A fix that works for me is to calculate resolution based on the segment
> limits:
> resolution = 1e-3 * segment.renderMinimum
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> witty-interest mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
