Hey,

I could indeed reproduce this problem with CLang + boost 1.57. I believe
it's a bug in boost but we can easily work around it. I've got a patch reay
for Wt.

Regards,
koen

2014-11-07 18:44 GMT+01:00 Wim Dumon <w...@emweb.be>:

> Ouch. I think we'll need to take a look at boost 1.57 ASAP, before the
> next release. We'll probably solve this before the next Wt release.
>
> Best regards,
> Wim.
>
>
> 2014-11-06 21:44 GMT+01:00 Raymond Burkholder <r...@oneunified.net>:
>
>> >
>> > Is clang 3.4 usable with Wt and boost 1.57?
>> >
>>
>> I was using today's git Wt release.  But I now am trying with gcc 4.8 and
>> obtain a similar issue, so perhaps boost 1.57 is too current.  So am
>> trying
>> boost 1.56.
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> witty-interest mailing list
>> witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> witty-interest mailing list
> witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to