1. The new code will be new code. If you don't use the new attributes
nothing will change. I'm planning to to this in wix38 (should have
mentioned that) so it must be backwards compatible.

2. The SCM will do whatever it is directed to do when the process crashes
based on the service configuration. Getting killed looks nearly identical
to crashing (I think your process ends with a different return code).


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Neil Sleightholm <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Sounds good but a couple of thoughts:****
>
> **1.       **I seem to remember find issues with the original
> implementation of CloseApplications with tray applications, might be worth
> making sure the new code doesn’t break anything (in my case it was a VB6
> application!)****
>
> **2.       **What would happen if someone tried to kill a service? I can
> think of a good reason to do this but it might be worth checking the
> outcome.****
>
> ** **
>
> Neil****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Rob Mensching [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 20 February 2013 20:20
> *To:* Windows Installer XML toolset developer mailing list
> *Subject:* [WiX-devs] RFC: CloseApps extension enhancements.****
>
> ** **
>
> I was using CloseApplications from the WixUtilExtension recently and found
> I needed a bit more functionality than what is currently present. ****
>
>  ****
>
> Here's what I'm thinking about adding:****
>
>  ****
>
> 1. Add "EndSessionMessage" and "ElevatedEndSessionMessage" attributes -
> this will more mimic the Restart Manager behavior where a
> WM_QUERYENDSESSION then WM_ENDSESSION is sent. Those messages seem to be
> more in vogue that sending a WM_CLOSE these days. I'm not planning to do it
> exactly like RM where all apps are sent a query message before sending the
> end session messages. I'm just going to do each message back to back
> (unless the query says don't try to end). I'm doing this because I found
> some apps that got unhappy being told to close. I'm not married to those
> attribute names.****
>
>  ****
>
> 2. Add "TerminateProcess" attribute - this will act similar to the
> existing RebootMessage attribute but kill the process instead of scheduling
> a restart. Killing processes is generally a bad thing but I've run into a
> couple customers now that say that is the correct way to close their
> process that has no window. I'm not married to that attribute name but
> "KillProcess" seemed a little aggressive. <smile/>****
>
>  ****
>
> 3. (if I have time) Add a "Timeout" attribute - this will allow each
> CloseApplication element to change the default wait when doing a close.
> Right now the default is hardcoded to 5 seconds which seems reasonable, but
> if I have time, I thought I'd allow it to be configurable.****
>
>  ****
>
> Any questions, concerns, suggestions?****
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
> _______________________________________________
> WiX-devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
WiX-devs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs

Reply via email to