Thanks Sudheer! I had found this and used it to construct the example I posted earlier, but it wasn't until I went through it more thoroughly and downloaded the working sample that I finally noticed the difference: The Record object's columns are 1-indexed, not 0-indexed. I didn't notice it until I had the working example and nonworking example side by side.
Those who may have been bitten by this unexpected feature of Windows Installer will appreciate the slew of vulgarity I restrained myself from broadcasting to the office. On a more practical note, this problem cost me two full days of development time to solve, so hopefully this summary will turn up faster on the Google searches of those looking for answers: When editing the ListBox table (or any table) at install time, if you're getting this error: "Database: Table(s) Update failed." It could be, among any of the other things that could cause this error, that you're using 0-indexing instead of 1-indexing to assign values to your new record. Which leads me to another question, though it might not be an appropriate topic for this list - why exactly *is* the Record object 1-indexed instead of 0-indexed? Thanks, Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ WiX-users mailing list WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
