On Thursday 19 January 2006 12:51, Bill Haneman wrote: > Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > >On 2006-01-19, Bill Haneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I don't understand what this has to do with the DO_NOT_DISTURB > >>suggestion, though.... > > > >That windows opened from an inactive window should not disturb the > >work in a window with recent activity. > > But the original post was much broader in scope, at least the way it was > written. > > Windows opened from an inactive window sometimes really must "disturb" > or at least post above the most-recently-active window. This is > important for alerts, and for certain accessibility use cases.
Yes. That's why I think it shouldn't be actually handled by the WM. -- Lubos Lunak KDE developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list wm-spec-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list