Dana Jansens wrote: > This has the property of being backwards compatible with previous > versions of the specification. An application can read only the first > n (number of desktops) dimensions and ignore the remainder, and it > will not end up putting icons in nowhereland.
It's probably not backward compatible; I know I've often written code that verifies the exact property length on various properties. But if the proposal is otherwise popular we can just use a different property name. Havoc _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list wm-spec-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
