Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > On 2007-10-18, Lubos Lunak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This "arbitrarily messed with", just to make it clear, just means that they >> will be composited on the screen, ... > Then there's of course the general UTF-8 monoculturism, but at least in > this case Xlib does the conversions from the abstract application internal > encoding (locale or wchar_t), unlike in many other FDO and other recent > FOSS crap, where the API and everything is UTF-8 monoculturist.
I gave up on most of the fragmented poorly designed non-console FOSS crap years ago for GUI development and just wrote my own far better frameworks and solutions. What alternative is there to UTF-8? An advantage of monoculturalism is that if the architecture is sufficient, everything can be consistant and easy. _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list wm-spec-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
