On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:02 +0100, Sanel Zukan wrote: > > The _NET_WM_CM_Sn selection is already widely used and it's been in the > > spec > > for a while, so it's a question if we want to break backwards compatibility > > there just because the name doesn't quite look right. > > Hm... currently this property (and/or _NET_WM_WINDOW_OPACITY) are > possible candidates for this spec (am I correct?). Anyone have > more proposals?
One thing I proposed before that I think would fit nicely into a CM spec would be a flag to tell the CM "don't mess with this window (e.g. don't do animations like fade-in on opening the window), just display it as-is". Something like override-redirect for CMs. This would allow developers to have full control of a window's appearance, for instance if they want to use auxiliary windows for animations. Regards, Denis _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list wm-spec-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
