Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> Hm, I think I didn't express myself well.
>
> I was just disappointed by the fact that I didn't see what
> those warnings he said he was fixing were. So I reverted
> his patch and compiled wmaker again expecting to see the
> warnings which were fixed by the patch, but only one
> such warning came up. The one in startup.c:613, which
> is indeed fixed by that part of Dan's patch which I quoted.
So - going forward - you would like to see more specific information in
the commit log.
> So in summary: You don't need to do anything :-)
Even better!
> I was just curious about the warnings and thought it
> would be a good motivation to review his patch, but
> I couldn't reproduce the warnings here (which is
> not unexpected, as I have a different gcc, different
> cpu etc).
Quite likely. That patch is three years old - there was even a Debian
release in that time!
--
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http ((((
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[
as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html ((((
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
