On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Dan Pascu wrote:
> I disagree with such a change. It is hardly a fix to be less explicit with > the function declarations. oh well, matter of preference, i guess. whatever. however, originally it was intended to pave the way to clean up the type mess between the defs and decls, mostly unsigned vs signed ints, but as i came to think of it, i couldn't decide which should it be. i'm hazarding a guess it was meant to be unsigned, but in the context of image manipulation and especially display, i can easily imagine signed as well. i'm not yet familiar enough with the code to make a well-educated choice, thus asking, which one shall it be? -- [-] mkdir /nonexistent -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
