On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Andreas Metzler wrote: hi,
> find attached a patch to update the docs to reflect the re-addition of > the tree-functions (would have been unncecessary if the documentation > had been part of the reverted removal patch ;-). i think a more practical approach would be to integrate some source documenting system (doxygen or whatever) into the build, and start writing api docs (even if only stubs for now, but in place and ready to be filled on boring weekends). in all reality this "foo added/removed" game is only so much useful, while an api ref would really be. -- [-] mkdir /nonexistent -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
