On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, Charles Philip Chan escribió: > "Carlos R. Mafra" <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 at 23:23:39 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > > >> -#define MAX_WINDOWLIST_WIDTH 160 > >> +#define MAX_WINDOWLIST_WIDTH 400 > > > > > > Why do you want/need to change this and why other > > people would also want this? You are more than > > doubling its value and I see no explanation for > > that. > > I always change this when I compile Window Maker. I find the default too > small- some of my windows have long titles.
Hi, first, thanks a lot for your patches. More developers, better wmaker. I will try to check your patches, to send my oppinion, but is only that "my oppinion". Only one thing, some of them should follow the coding style (https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle) About this patch, I agree with you. The MAX_WINDOWLIST_WIDTH size had a good value some time ago, because the screen resolutions were small (like 640x400), but now the standard size is... 1024x768? I think we can increase this value now. Is the max value, wmaker will use it only if the window has a long title, not always. A bigger value could be used yet in "old" screens. But, the question is... what is the good size. 400? 320? (for old 320x240 screens and some mobiles (think in the wmaker future ;-)) ), ... I am not sure 400 is a good size, but I agree 160 is small now. Cheers, kix -- ||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia ||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/ -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
