On Thu 20.Aug'09 at 9:01:16 -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > I'm open to suggestion. Currently, there are two main branches: default > and wm_0_92. The idea is that a patch is applied to default, and if > appropriate, transplanted to the wm_0_92 branch. If the patch fixes a > bug in the stable, that is not in the dev, then it would be applied to > wm_0_92 directly. > > I'm open to suggestion, though.
It would be nice that the clear-cut bug fixes like Samir Saada's fix for the 82nd workspace and the "menu display bug" would be applied as soon as possible. There are also a few patches from Suse which were posted by Vladimir Nadvornik back in March. If the latency to get these bug fixes upstream is too high I guess people will not be motivated to share their patches again (fixing minor issues which affected them somehow, just like in Daniel's case). Just a thought though, I appreciate the work you put into the hg repo so far etc. But it is important that we don't appear to be dead for bug fix patches. Because if you don't react in a timely manner the hg repo will not receive much testing to these bug fixes. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
