On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 at 0:33:43 +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:22:18PM +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 at 0:02:07 +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 10:48:08PM +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > > > > > > What happens if you don't have git installed? > > > > > > > > > I thought we were just distributing the source via git (thus one is > > > supposed to > > > have git installed), but i see your point - i should wrap the SHA part in > > > a > > > shell script that fails graciously in case git is missing. > > > > Furthermore, I think that simply appending the sha1 unconditionally is > > annoying. For a released version we want to have eg '0.95.6' and > > not '0.95.6-3bd9e83'. The sha1 string should be present only in between > > full releases. > > Right, but i don't think there's a way to distinguish between the two - you > should just comment it out when you cut a new release and re-enable it > afterwards.
Perhaps the way to go is to use 'git describe' and some cutting of the output. For the release commit the output is: wmaker-0.95.6 and from the top of #next is: wmaker-0.95.6-331-gfc43778 -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
