Axis2 and wooden

[Chathura Herath]

Hi, This is my idea of how the Axis2 and wooden integration. We already have a Component model (WOM) in Axis2 which is WSDL 2.0 compliant and we are ready to throw it away and get Axis2 to work on wooden. But the support for WSDL 1.1 is an absolute necessity. Currently what we do in Axis2 is that get the wsdl4j to parse the WSDL (1.1) file and build a WOM out of it (Note: The WOM is a WSDL 2.0 compliant model and we do some work to make it happen even in the absence of constructs like Message 2.0.). Think our concentration will be to do a WSDL2.0 TO Wooden builder. If we can have a WSDL1.1 TO Wooden builder too then I can strip away WOM and get Axis2 to work on wooden directly. That would be best case for Axis2.   Lawrence, I ll have a look at what’s checked in to get an idea of how I can be of help. I would like to know the view of the team to the WSDL1.1 TO Wooden builder   Chathura       From: Lawrence Mandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 11:06 PM To: woden-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: RE: Fw: Copyright's for incoming projects   John, Chathura has volunteered to contribute. (Thanks Chathura!) Can you suggest some areas in which you can use help at this point? Thanks, Lawrence "Chathura Herath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/13/2005 04:54 AM Please respond to woden-dev To <woden-dev@ws.apache.org> cc   Subject RE: Fw: Copyright's for incoming projects   Hi Sanjiva, all, Had a look around after seeing the recent mails and had a look at the svn location and found some implementation there. Didn't see any svn commit nor discussions either. Is the commits get posted to axis-cvs@ws.apache.org ???. I have already gone through some of the work that is to be done. I didn't know that there has been commits. I am very much willing put some time into this and contribute. +1 to discussions on this list. Chathura > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 2:18 PM > To: woden-dev@ws.apache.org > Subject: Re: Fw: Copyright's for incoming projects > > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 01:33 -0400, Lawrence Mandel wrote: > > > > Hi Sanjiva, > > > > Development had already started on the WSDL 2.0 validating parser but > > the parser was not yet well developed. The parser was donated and > > development is now continuing at Apache with the Woden project. > > Where? Is there another list?? > > > Woden is currently being developed using the public SVN repository. I > > agree that it doesn't make sense to develop in a closed or private > > setting and that is certainly not the intention of the few of us > > working on Woden. If it seems that way it's probably because so far > > John Kaputin has made the bulk of the code contribution. > > I'm confused .. is Woden not one and the same as the "WSDL 2.0 > validating parser" you referred to above? > > Are commit messages going somewhere else? If not IIRC I haven't received > any commit messages. > > > I'd also like to see more discussion on this list and also agree that > > input from interested groups (such as Axis, Eclipse, and the W3C) will > > be beneficial at this early stage of development. > > I'd like to see *some* discussion on this list ;-). The only message in > May for example AFAICT was about the Web site! I don't recall a single > technical discussion ... did I just miss a bunch of mail? > > > Arthur Ryman is acting as the W3C WSDL 2.0 working group > > representative and I am acting as the Eclipse WTP representative to > > this project. I know John has been in touch with someone from Axis but > > can you act as a representative for Axis and bring Axis related > > concerns to the attention of this list? If not, is there someone else > > you can recommend to fill this role? > > Chathura Herath, who's doing the WOM stuff in Axis2, was listed as a > co-committer for Woden. However, AFAIK he hasn't had any contact with > the Woden team either. > > I will also be around and will be happy to help build bridges as needed. > > Sanjiva. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]