John,
I just committed the corrected schema. [1] Please verify the fix. Thx.
[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.xsd
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| "Jonathan Marsh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/08/2005 12:39 PM |
|
Thanks for raising this issue. The WG agreed that the schema needs to be fixed to indicate that extensibility elements are allowed on import and include elements. We are attempting to put this in place prior to our publication of the Candidate Recommendation.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kaputin (gmail)
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Do <import> and <include> support extensibility elements?
I'd like to clarify which WSDL elements support extensibility elements.
Part 1, section 6.1 Element based Extensibility states:
WSDL 2.0 allows namespace-qualified element information items whose [namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl" to appear among the [children] of specific element information items whose [namespace name] is "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl".
The word 'specific' suggests some WSDL elements do not support extensibility elements. This is backed up by the WSDL 2.0 schema at http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/wsdl20.xsd which indicates that all WSDL 2.0 elements except <import> and <include> support extensibility elements.
However, in Part 1 all of the sections that describe the xml representation for each WSDL element state that the [children] of the WSDL element may contain:
Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose [namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl"
i.e. this text applies to <include> and <import> too, in sections 4.1 and 4.2, which seems to contradict the schema.
Is this correct? Can <include> and <import> have extensibility elements?
Thanks,
John Kaputin.
