Lawrence, I'd quite like an extra day as well as Arthur if that's ok. Thx, Jeremy
On 1/19/06, Arthur Ryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lawrence, > > Great progress. However I'd like to request that you allow more time for > people to really evaluate the code before voting. Can you extend the deadline > to EOD Jan. 20? > > Arthur Ryman, > IBM Software Group, Rational Division > > blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 01/18/2006 04:55 PM > > Please respond to > woden-dev > > > To [email protected] > > cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate - please vote by EOD Thursday, Jan. 19 > > > > > > > > > > Woden committers, I'd like to request your vote on the status of M3. I've > placed a Woden 1.0.0 > M3 Candidate build at > > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M3-incubating/ > > The Woden M3 candidate includes the major work items from the M3 plan. > Specifically, the following items are complete in the M3 Candidate: > > Parsing of WSDL 2.0 import and include (DOM) > WSDL 2.0 Service parsing (DOM) > Implement validation logic for Binding > Unit tests for validation logic for Binding > Integrate W3C WSDL 2.0 Binding tests into Woden test suite > > The following items are incomplete in the M2 plan: > > Unit tests for import and include parsing (DOM) > WSDL 2.0 HTTP Binding extension (DOM) > Unit tests for HTTP Binding extension (DOM) > Unit tests for Service parsing (DOM) > Investigate WSDL 2.0 parsing with StAX > Update technical documentation about Woden design and implementation on Wiki > Create initial user documentation > > In an effort to make Woden more immediately usable, we deferred HTTP Binding > extension work to M4 in favour of adding support for WSDL import and include > elements. StAX will continue to be an investigation item until the DOM > implementation is close to complete or we get more development help. John and > I are working on user documentation and should have it ready for the Woden > site around the proposed M3 release on Friday. Automated tests for the parser > continue to require attention but, as John has conducted manual testing and > the W3C test suite has been integrated into the Woden automated test suite, > we are in good shape for M3. > > Both John and I think Woden is in good shape to declare M3 as solid progress > has been made on the parser and the validator. At this point we'd like to ask > the Woden committers to vote on the status of M3. John and I both vote +1 (so > +2). Please vote ASAP. We will collect votes until EOD (5pm EST) Thursday, > Jan. 19. If there are no negative votes I will then request WS and Incubator > PMC approval to release M3 by EOD Friday, Jan. 20. Once the PMCs approve, M3 > will be declared and a link will be placed on the Woden site. (Feel free to > reply to this note with any concerns over this process.) > > Thanks, > > Lawrence Mandel > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
