On 8/15/06, Graham Turrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi List,

A quick question (which may or may not have a simple answer!):

Is there a goal (real or ideological) to remove any indirect Sax
dependencies from Woden (for non-DOM based parsers).
The StaX parser  makes use of o.a.ws.commons.schema.XMLSchemaCollection,

Do you mean the support in Woden for StAX or the StAX parser (woodstox) itself?

for example,
which does have sax dependancies.

Is it getting in the way then?


My reason for asking is germaine to current work I'm doing on the URI
resolver (WODEN-14 [1]): Sax provides a very similar resolver framework,
and I need
to either plug my resolver directly into XMLSchemaCollection

AFAIR XmlSchema has its own resolver mechanism see:
org.apache.ws.commons.schema.resolver.* package. I guess the Woden
resolver is going to have to work with the XmlSchema resolver in order
to produce a fully resolved tree of WSDL and schema. Is this what
you're getting at?

or find another solution.

Thanks :)

[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-14


Cheers,
Jeremy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to