I'd still like to get a confirmation from legal-discuss, like Lawrence says just incase they have any kind of view on this.
Thanks,
Jeremy
The W3C WSDL 2.0 schemas are licenced under the W3C Software Licence [1]
We are allowed to redistribute it. We just need to include the notice too. Here is the text of the licence:
W3C® SOFTWARE NOTICE AND LICENSE
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231This work (and included software, documentation such as READMEs, or other related items) is being provided by the copyright holders under the following license. By obtaining, using and/or copying this work, you (the licensee) agree that you have read, understood, and will comply with the following terms and conditions.
Permission to copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation, with or without modification, for any purpose and without fee or royalty is hereby granted, provided that you include the following on ALL copies of the software and documentation or portions thereof, including modifications:
1. The full text of this NOTICE in a location viewable to users of the redistributed or derivative work.
2. Any pre-existing intellectual property disclaimers, notices, or terms and conditions. If none exist, the W3C Software Short Notice should be included (hypertext is preferred, text is permitted) within the body of any redistributed or derivative code.
3. Notice of any changes or modifications to the files, including the date changes were made. (We recommend you provide URIs to the location from which the code is derived.)THIS SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS," AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR THAT THE USE OF THE SOFTWARE OR DOCUMENTATION WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY THIRD PARTY PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS OR OTHER RIGHTS.
COPYRIGHT HOLDERS WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF ANY USE OF THE SOFTWARE OR DOCUMENTATION.
The name and trademarks of copyright holders may NOT be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to the software without specific, written prior permission. Title to copyright in this software and any associated documentation will at all times remain with copyright holders.
____________________________________
This formulation of W3C's notice and license became active on December 31 2002. This version removes the copyright ownership notice such that this license can be used with materials other than those owned by the W3C, reflects that ERCIM is now a host of the W3C, includes references to this specific dated version of the license, and removes the ambiguous grant of "use". Otherwise, this version is the same as the previous version and is written so as to preserve the Free Software Foundation's assessment of GPL compatibility and OSI's certification under the Open Source Definition. Please see our Copyright FAQ for common questions about using materials from our site, including specific terms and conditions for packages like libwww, Amaya, and Jigsaw. Other questions about this notice can be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Joseph Reagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Last revised $Id: copyright-software-20021231.html,v 1.11 2004/07/06 16:02:49 slesch Exp $
[1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]10/19/2006 10:51 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]
To[email protected] cc SubjectInclusion of W3C (c) files (was: [jira] Commented: (WODEN-64) Multiple wsdl*xsd files)
On the Monday telecon we discussed [1]:---------------------------------------------------------------------
Graham will investigate any Apache process that needs to be followed
to bundle the W3C WSDL 2.0 schemas with Woden.
IMHO redistributing the schemas in our milestone releases is different
to just including them in SVN for testing purposes. The wsdl schema
has actually been in SVN since Feb for this this purpose, but isn't in
the distribution.
Since Graham's patch included another copy of the wsdl schema (and
others) I committed it to where his patch had it rather that try to
consolidate with the one under the ant-tests directory. Hence JIRA
WODEN-64 to tidy this up.
As we agreed on the call, figuring out whether we're able to bundle
the schemas in Woden is the topic of Graham's (soon to be posted)
email to legal-discuss.
Do you have extra concerns? Do you think we should ask legal-discuss
to gain approval for putting W3C licensed files into SVN? There are
many instances of W3C licensed files e.g. [2] and others in that
directory. The files in the directory of [2] are also shipped in a
source form in Xerces. So I think there is plenty of precedent for
allowing these files in Apache SVN but it's good to check with
legal-discuss that we're doing the right thing w.r.t. bundling the
files in our distribution.
Cheers,
Jeremy
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/commons/trunk/java/external/src/org/w3c/dom/Attr.java
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lawrence Mandel (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 19, 2006 3:20 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (WODEN-64) Multiple wsdl*xsd files
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-64?page=comments#action_12443537
]
Lawrence Mandel commented on WODEN-64:
--------------------------------------
I'm a little surprised to hear that these files are in Woden's
repository. Although I'm no legal expert I think that we need to clear
up any legal hurdles to redistributing these files. (From past
experience at Eclipse, without permission to redistribute the files we
shouldn't even have them in our repository.) Graham is currently
looking into this issue.
> Multiple wsdl*xsd files
> -----------------------
>
> Key: WODEN-64
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-64
> Project: Woden
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jeremy Hughes
> Priority: Minor
>
> WODEN-14 introduced some test cases for URI resolution (as well as the URI resolution code itself). Included in those test cases are:
> wsdl20.xsd wsdl20-extensions.xsd wsdl20-http.xsd ws20-instance.xsd wsdl20-rpc.xsd wsdl20-soap.xsd
> which are also in the ant-tests directory. We should refactor so there is only one copy
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
