Re Woden-108, do we need to include a disclaimer in our JAR? Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/06/2006 11:58 PM Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject Re: [VOTE] JIRAs flagged for M7 I'm +1 on all the Jiras except those I've listed in this e-mail. For those I've listed I'd like some more information before giving my +1. Woden-49 to Woden-55 John, I seem to recall you saying that these unit test Jiras would be solved by the improved WSDL working group test suite. As your comment in each of the Jiras states, "The objective here is simply to test the Woden API. Complete functional tests for service and endpoint should be provided by the W3C WSDL 2.0 Test Suite. " I agree with this comment that the tests in the WSDL working group test suite are functional tests and the unit tests identified in these Jiras should focus on testing individual methods. If this is the case I'd like to see these Jiras resolved by creating method level tests rather than simply relying on the WSDL test suite. Can this work be contained in M7? Woden-108 I'm not sure this Jira should be handled by Woden. This seems like an Axis2 problem to me. Thanks, Lawrence John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/01/2006 11:41 AM Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject [VOTE] JIRAs flagged for M7 Of the 49 outstanding JIRAs, 33 are now flagged for the M7 release. When I went through the list I commented in some of the non-M7 JIRAs why they shouldn't be flagged for M7 - that doesn't exclude them from being done for M7, it just means they are no 'show stoppers' for M7. Before next Tuesday's Woden call/chat can you please review the M7 list and the non-M7 outstanding JIRAs and comment on the JIRA or mailing list if you think any JIRAs should/shouldn't be on the M7 list. If you are happy with the M7 list please vote your acceptance to woden-dev, so that hopefully by Tuesday we can agree the scope for M7 and then think about effort, time and a likely release date. Here's my +1 for the current M7 JIRA list. regards, John Kaputin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
