Jeremy, Yes, Eclipse does. Also, maybe Apache projects have binary and source distributions. Personally, I think the debug info is a minor contribution to the size, and it useful at runtime too since it helps in diagnosing problems. The source is a bigger contribution and is not needed at runtime.
Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/08/2007 10:48 AM Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject Re: source and line number info in stack traces On 08/01/07, Arthur Ryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > I think we should create two packages: > > 1. A binary distribution for runtime use. > 2. An SDK version for development use. This has class files compiled with debug information and source code so people can do source level debugging. Is this something other projects do in general. I didn't think it was such a big performance drain. I guess I should back that up with some data, but can't find any immediately. Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
