Hi John, Agree 100% with both your comments below.
Regards, Graham Turrell John Kaputin/UK/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/01/2007 12:20:20: > Woden provides a warranty on it's (good) behaviour if you use it via the > prescribed programming model - via its API. If as white box unit testers > you to choose to use the Impl classes and their ctors directly, rather than > build a model via the API, then you need to ensure everything is > initialized correctly which requires some knowledge of the internals so > that you can include the necessary initialization in your test case setup > code. I guess this is what I was getting at. Unit test programmer beware > and expect the unexpected (e.g. NPE) if you do it wrong. > > With regards to whether or not users might be misled by our unit test code > and/or use it as an excuse for coding outside the API, I do think we need > to be clear in our User documentation that using Woden via it's API and > it's prescribed programming model is the only supported usage. > > regards, > John Kaputin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
