I'll be adding this to the W3C test suite soon. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/07/2007 02:34 PM Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc "Jacek Kopecky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject Re: woden bug report I can recreate this error with M6, but not with WsdlCm from the M7 branch, so I think its fixed (I didn't diagnose the M6 failure any further). With M7, the Woden object model does have the correct values for message label. The M7 WsdlCm results are attached here: regards, John Kaputin "Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/02/2007 13:51 Please respond to [email protected] To "Jacek Kopecky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc [email protected] Subject Re: woden bug report Jacek, If you were using M6, then you wouldn't have seen line numbers in the stack trace. We've fixed that, so M7 will tell you file:line number info. Regards, Jeremy On 07/02/07, Arthur Ryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jacek, > > Thanks for reporting this problem. > > Apache-speak for bugs reporting is issue-tracking and we use Jira in Woden. [1] Please enter this report in Jira. You may need to register first. > > I also suggest you contribute this test case to the W3C test suite. We have one from Sparql and it exposed a lot of problems. > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/Woden > > Arthur Ryman, > IBM Software Group, Rational Division > > blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Jacek Kopecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 02/06/2007 01:29 PM > > To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc > > > Subject woden bug report > > > > > > > > Dear Arthur, > I downloaded Woden to validate some WSDL files and I uncovered what > seems to be a bug. I failed to find a way to submit that bug on the > Woden pages, so here goes. 8-) > > When I parse [1] with org.apache.woden.ant.WsdlCm, it dies on null > pointer exception somewhere in one of the write() methods (it doesn't > tell me the line). I added the appropriate message label on the > wsdl:outfault element and it doesn't do the exception. Therefore > I indirectly diagnose that the parser doesn't fill in the outfault > message label when it's not present and returns null to the WsdlCm > writer. > > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/wsdl2.0/04-fault-annotation.wsdl > > Best regards, > Jacek > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test.xml
Description: Binary data
report.xml
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
