Jonathan, Thx.
John - fyi, the test case that Jacek reported as causing a failure in Woden M6 is now in the test suite along with several others. Pls rerun the results on M7. Thx. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Jonathan Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/09/2007 01:09 AM To "'Jacek Kopecky'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc "'WS-Description WG'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite I added these to the test suite, though wsdl-xslt doesn't have support for the SAWSDL extension yet, and I'll need to write the interchange format extension schema... Regenerated zips for Woden as well. Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacek Kopecky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:10 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: 'WS-Description WG' > Subject: RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite > > Hi Jonathan, > on the topic of keeping the test cases in sync with their source, maybe > the TestMetadata.xml could contain a source URI and the testing > infrastructure could just update the local copy once in a while if the > source URI is provided. > On the question of support, in our implementation efforts, we expect to > extend Woden (and maybe WSDL4J for WSDL1.1) to support SAWSDL, but I'm > not sure about how this would show up in the component model > (interchange format). > > Jacek > > On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:01 -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > I agree these would be great to add to the test suite, esp. the > plain.wsdl > > to ensure you're annotating something our tools have reported success > with. > > > > The other test cases, which require support for an extension, would be > > useful for testing of validators, but would not show up on the > interchange > > results unless implementations declared support for them. Since the > > extension is straightforward, I would be able to trivially support it in > > wsdl-xslt, and would be willing to do that work at some point. > > > > However, the sparql-query test case demonstrates that we don't have a > good > > model for sharing test cases. If we copy the test cases into our test > > suite, how should they be kept in sync? Should we write a task that > > refreshes them from your "master" copy? Should we own the master and > have > > you maintain them in one place? > > > > Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - > http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > > > Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:11 AM > > > To: WS-Description WG > > > Subject: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > there are 18 WSDL 2.0 documents at [1] annotated with SAWSDL > attributes > > > for the purposes of the SAWSDL's nascent test suite [2] that might be > > > useful in the WSDL test suite as well. > > > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/wsdl2.0/ > > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/testsuite > > > > > > It's basically one simple WSDL document annotated in various places > with > > > our extension attributes, but I've already had a problem with Woden > > > parsing of 04-fault-annotation.wsdl due to what seems to be a bug in > > > fault reference handling, so maybe the files could be helpful. > > > > > > Currently the links are member-only, but I'm working on fixing that. > And > > > I'll zip the files and send them to somebody if that would help. I > don't > > > feel comfortable updating the WSDL test suite directly myself, having > > > never done it before. > > > > > > Hope it helps, > > > Jacek > > > > > >
