Dan,

Thanks again for all your contributions and your commitment to Woden and 
Open Source development. I know the community will appreciate your keeping 
tabs on the project and responding to questions.

Have a great year at school!

Lawrence 




"Dan Harvey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
09/20/2007 10:10 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: Woden development process doc






Lawrence,

Thanks for reading it through, I've changed the ant build script 
descriptions now to make more sense. I'm not quite sure myself what I 
meant before... I've also added a small introduction to the packages we 
build and why as you said would be useful. 

All,

My last day working at IBM is tomorrow and I'm back off to university the 
week after, so I may as well say thanks now for all making it easy to get 
into the Woden project and being helpful this summer. I've had a great 
time and enjoyed the variety of work Woden has brought to me. Even though 
I won't have time to work on Woden whilst I'm at university I'm not just 
disappearing, I will probably will stay subscribed to this list for awhile 
so if anyone has any questions about my code or contributions then I will 
respond. It'll be good to see when the Woden 1.0 release happens as well!

Thanks,

Dan Harvey

On 18/09/2007, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Dan,

Nice work on the documentation. Overall it's very good. If you have time 
before you finish up this week can you clarify the 2 areas below in the
build section:

1. I don't think the statement "Runs every build target below" is very
clear. Do you mean the targets below in the build.xml file? The
documentation should be readable on its own. I think a simple statement
like the following is better for consumers of this information.

buildAll - Builds all Woden packages (API, DOM, and OM) 

The top level ant targets we have and their uses are :-
buildAll - Runs every build target below.
buildAndTestAll - Runs every build target below then runs all the test
targets as explained in the Testing section. 
distBuild - Runs buildAll then creates the compressed archives for the
distributions we have.
buildAPI - Runs every build target below.
buildDOM - Runs every build target below.
buildOM - Runs every build target below. 

2. I think a few sentences about why Woden builds API, DOM and OM packages
would be useful as an introduction to the build process on Woden packaging
before getting into the build technologies.

I'll take a pass at this next week to correct any grammar or spelling 
mistakes and perhaps elaborate a bit. After this documentation is
committed we just have one section left to fill in: Source Code.

Lawrence




"Dan Harvey" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/18/2007 06:56 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
[email protected] 
cc

Subject
Re: Woden development process doc






Lawrence,

Yes its does include both points, but I've just tired to find where in
Jira I've attached the patch for the site and can't seem to find it.. 
So I've created the patch again from my source and attached it to
Woden-67, also reading it though again I've added a few lines about making
sure you run the tests and how to add too both of the test suites. If you 
want to read through it before its committed its here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12366083/site.patch

Thanks,

Dan

On 17/09/2007, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arthur,

Good suggestions. Dan has written up a testing section that needs to be
added to the process doc.

Dan - Does your testing section cover the two items Arthur suggested
below? If not, can you work them in?

Thanks,

Lawrence




"Arthur Ryman" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/16/2007 10:49 PM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: Woden development process doc






Lawrence,

I was looking at the Testing section of the dev process. I suggest it
include the following (this is just an outline - the details need to 
be filled in):

1. There is a suite of JUnit tests. These should be run before
committing any new code or fixes. You should add tests to this suite
to cover any new code or fixes.

2. There is an Ant task, validatewsdl20, (class 
org.apache.woden.ant.ValidateWSDL20, see the ant-test directory for
build.xml) that runs Woden against a set of WSDL 2.0 documents. This
task should be run against the W3C Test Suite. The results include a
set of generated Component Model Interchange format XML documents, and 
a report that contains any violated Assertions. These results can be
compared against the expected results by running scripts provided by
the W3C. The results can also be posted to the W3C WSDL 2.0 Web site
to advertised progress as an implementation of the WSDL 2.0 spec. New
test cases may be added to the W3C Test Suite by submitting then to
the W3C Bugzilla system.

On 8/27/07, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> Thanks for pointing out the incorrect link Sagara. The link was wrong on
> the Woden status page as well. I've corrected both and they will be
> visible the next time the site is refreshed. (This happens every few 
> hours.)
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
>
> "Sagara Gunathunga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 08/27/2007 01:50 AM 
> Please respond to
> [email protected]
>
>
> To
> [email protected]
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Woden development process doc
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Lawrence,
> I have notice that there is a small error with projectsusingwoden page
> [1].  The link Apache Axis2 is not reference to the correct location. It 

> also reference to Apache ServiceMix project.
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/projectsusingwoden.html
>
> Thanks 
> Sagara
> Blog - ssagara.blogspot.com
>
>
> On 8/22/07, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've made some further updates to the Woden development process document

> [1]. There are three TBD items currently in the document.
>
> 1. TBD: Fill in details about Java coding conventions. 
> 2. TBD: Insert details about how to test Woden
> 3. TBD: Insert details of the Woden build process
>
> John, I'm hoping you can handle 1. No rush on this.
>
> Dan has already written content for 2 and 3 that will be added to the 
> document shortly.
>
> I would appreciate a review of the content by the Woden team and
> community. Specifically, are there any topics that are not present, any
> topics that require further elaboration, and any topics that require 
> correction.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lawrence
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/dev/devprocess.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sagara Gunathunga
>
> Blog - ssagara.blogspot.com 
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to