Author: jkaputin
Date: Tue Nov 20 07:05:38 2007
New Revision: 596710

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596710&view=rev
Log:
Update the M8 milestone plan and the comments for
the 1.0 release.

Modified:
    incubator/woden/Site/build/site/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.html
    
incubator/woden/Site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.xml

Modified: incubator/woden/Site/build/site/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/woden/Site/build/site/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.html?rev=596710&r1=596709&r2=596710&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- incubator/woden/Site/build/site/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.html (original)
+++ incubator/woden/Site/build/site/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.html Tue Nov 20 
07:05:38 2007
@@ -179,10 +179,10 @@
 <a href="#M7b+-+August+3%2C+2007">M7b - August 3, 2007</a>
 </li>
 <li>
-<a href="#M8+-+expected+August+2007">M8 - expected August 2007</a>
+<a href="#M8+-+due+December+2007">M8 - due December 2007</a>
 </li>
 <li>
-<a 
href="#Woden+1.0+-+Date+is+conditional+upon+graduation+from+incubation">Woden 
1.0 - Date is conditional upon graduation from incubation</a>
+<a href="#Woden+1.0+-+expected+early+2008">Woden 1.0 - expected early 2008</a>
 </li>
 <li>
 <a href="#Legend">Legend</a>
@@ -553,142 +553,83 @@
         </p>
 </div>  
     
-<a name="N103E9"></a><a name="M8+-+expected+August+2007"></a>
-<h2 class="boxed">M8 - expected August 2007</h2>
+<a name="N103E9"></a><a name="M8+-+due+December+2007"></a>
+<h2 class="boxed">M8 - due December 2007</h2>
 <div class="section">
 <p>
-        The main objective of the M8 release will be full compliance with the 
anticipated
-        W3C WSDL 2.0 Recommendation (that is, with the final spec). We expect 
the WSDL 2.0 spec 
-        will move to Proposed Recommendation in April and then to 
Recommendation about a month after PR. 
-        The release date for Woden M8 has not yet been determined.
+        The M8 release will complete Woden's compliance with the W3C WSDL 2.0 
Recommendation. 
+        The M7 release completed spec-compliance for valid WSDL documents. M8 
will complete
+        spec-compliance for invalid WSDL by supporting all of the validation 
assertions defined by the 
+        Recommendation.
         </p>
 <p>
-        The main objective of Woden M7 was spec-compliance for valid WSDL 
documents. The focus for M8 will be
-        spec-compliance for invalid WSDL. That is, to complete the validation 
functionality in Woden so that
-        rule-sequence dependencies and all WSDL 2.0 assertions are fully 
supported.
-        Woden M8 will also reflect any changes to the WSDL 2.0 spec and test 
suite since
-        Woden M7's compliance for 'valid' WSDL was established on 10th 
February.
-        </p>
-<p>
-        The priority 1 release-defining criteria for M8 are:
+        The release-defining criteria for M8 are:
         </p>
 <ul>
             
 <li>to pass all of the 'good' WSDL test cases in the W3C WSDL 2.0 test 
suite</li>
             
 <li>to pass all of the 'bad' WSDL test cases in the W3C WSDL 2.0 test 
suite</li>
-        
-</ul>
-<p>
-        Priority 2 criteria for M8 are:
-        </p>
-<ul>
             
-<li>Changes to the extension architecture deferred from M7</li>
+<li>to implement the changes to the extension architecture deferred from 
M7</li>
             
-<li>Any other outstanding API changes</li>
-        
+<li>to support validation of WSDL extensions in a way that allows users to 
+                provide validation logic for their WSDL extensions.</li>
         
 </ul>
 <p>
-          See the <a href="http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/Woden";>Woden 
JIRAs</a> marked with Version M8 for a list of 
-          outstanding function planned for M8.
+          See the <a 
href="http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN/fixforversion/12312291";>
+          Woden JIRAs to be fixed for Version M8</a> for the remaining 
function planned for M8.
+        </p>
+<p>
+        The JIRAs considered part of the release-defining criteria are:
         </p>
 <ul>
-
-            
-<li>WSDL 2.0 Validation JIRAs (Priority 1):
-
-              <ul>
-                
-<li>WODEN-3 Add component name to Schema-0016 assertion message </li>
-                
+          
 <li>WODEN-39 W3C WSDL2 tests should include assertions </li>
-                
+          
+<li>WODEN-47 Extensions as generic collections </li>
+          
+<li>WODEN-56 Extensions API should not use *internal* classes </li>
+          
 <li>WODEN-62 Adding an assertion check should be simple </li>
-                
+          
 <li>WODEN-74 Missing QName resolution error for {interface fault} property of 
Interface </li>
-                
+          
 <li>WODEN-103 Several binding assertion failures </li>
-                
+          
 <li>WODEN-104 Several import/include assertion failures </li>
-                
+          
 <li>WODEN-105 Several interface assertion failures </li>
-                
+          
 <li>WODEN-106 Several types/schema assertions failures </li>
-                
+          
 <li>WODEN-107 Several qname assertion failures </li>
-                
+          
 <li>WODEN-122 Implement EBNF grammar for {http location} </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-137 QName deserialization test fails on Sun Java 5 JRE </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-149 Use the new WSDL 2.0 assertion numbers <img alt="finished" 
height="10" src="../../images/ok.gif" width="10"></li>
-              
-</ul>
-            
-</li>
-
-            
-<li>Other High Priority JIRAs (Priority 2):
-
-              <ul>
-                
-<li>WODEN-47 Extensions as generic collections </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-56 Extensions API should not use *internal* classes </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-84 Some internally defined constants should be on the API </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-135 Element API, scope of interface and binding fault refs to 
include extended interfaces </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-136 Message content model should not be represented in the Element 
API </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-138 XML catalog should not need Java system properties </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-141 DescriptionElement.getTypesElement() should not be a factory 
method </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-142 &lt;documentation&gt; should not be wrapped as java.lang.Object 
</li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-147 Entity resolver needed </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-151 WSDL4J license is missing in the release archive files </li>
-              
-</ul>
-            
-</li>
-
-            
-<li>Lower Priority JIRAs:
-
-              <ul>
-                
-<li>WODEN-32 toString() methods to aid debugging </li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-33 DocumentationElement should extend NestedElement <img 
alt="finished" height="10" src="../../images/ok.gif" width="10"></li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-67 Modularize the build to separate the DOM and OM implementations 
</li>
-                
-<li>WODEN-115 Support wsdl:description nested within other XML documents </li>
-              
-</ul>
-            
-</li>
-
-        
+          
+<li>WODEN-157 SOAP binding reuse of HTTP properties </li>
+          
+<li>WODEN-158 SOAPBindingOperationExtensions does not have 
isHttpLocationIgnoreUncited </li>
+       
 </ul>
 </div>
     
-<a name="N10482"></a><a 
name="Woden+1.0+-+Date+is+conditional+upon+graduation+from+incubation"></a>
-<h2 class="boxed">Woden 1.0 - Date is conditional upon graduation from 
incubation</h2>
+<a name="N10439"></a><a name="Woden+1.0+-+expected+early+2008"></a>
+<h2 class="boxed">Woden 1.0 - expected early 2008</h2>
 <div class="section">
 <p>
-               The initial release of Woden will support DOM parsing and 
validation of WSDL 2.0
-               documents.
+               The 1.0 release of Woden will support DOM parsing and 
validation of WSDL 2.0
+               documents. The main objective of this release will be to 
deliver a stable Woden API.
+               That is, a committed API for future releases. User feedback 
from the milestone releases 
+               so far has resulted in ongoing improvements to the Woden API. 
Further work will be required
+               for the 1.0 release to agree the final API. 
+               Some <a 
href="http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Woden/APIReview";>API review issues</a>
+               have already been caputured on the Woden wiki.
        </p>
 </div> 
     
-<a name="N1048C"></a><a name="Legend"></a>
+<a name="N10447"></a><a name="Legend"></a>
 <h2 class="boxed">Legend</h2>
 <div class="section">
 <table class="ForrestTable" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4">

Modified: 
incubator/woden/Site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/woden/Site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.xml?rev=596710&r1=596709&r2=596710&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
incubator/woden/Site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.xml 
(original)
+++ 
incubator/woden/Site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.xml 
Tue Nov 20 07:05:38 2007
@@ -248,94 +248,57 @@
         </p>
     </section>  
     <section>
-      <title>M8 - expected August 2007</title>
+      <title>M8 - due December 2007</title>
         <p>
-        The main objective of the M8 release will be full compliance with the 
anticipated
-        W3C WSDL 2.0 Recommendation (that is, with the final spec). We expect 
the WSDL 2.0 spec 
-        will move to Proposed Recommendation in April and then to 
Recommendation about a month after PR. 
-        The release date for Woden M8 has not yet been determined.
+        The M8 release will complete Woden's compliance with the W3C WSDL 2.0 
Recommendation. 
+        The M7 release completed spec-compliance for valid WSDL documents. M8 
will complete
+        spec-compliance for invalid WSDL by supporting all of the validation 
assertions defined by the 
+        Recommendation.
         </p>
         <p>
-        The main objective of Woden M7 was spec-compliance for valid WSDL 
documents. The focus for M8 will be
-        spec-compliance for invalid WSDL. That is, to complete the validation 
functionality in Woden so that
-        rule-sequence dependencies and all WSDL 2.0 assertions are fully 
supported.
-        Woden M8 will also reflect any changes to the WSDL 2.0 spec and test 
suite since
-        Woden M7's compliance for 'valid' WSDL was established on 10th 
February.
-        </p>
-        <p>
-        The priority 1 release-defining criteria for M8 are:
+        The release-defining criteria for M8 are:
         </p>
         <ul>
             <li>to pass all of the 'good' WSDL test cases in the W3C WSDL 2.0 
test suite</li>
             <li>to pass all of the 'bad' WSDL test cases in the W3C WSDL 2.0 
test suite</li>
+            <li>to implement the changes to the extension architecture 
deferred from M7</li>
+            <li>to support validation of WSDL extensions in a way that allows 
users to 
+                provide validation logic for their WSDL extensions.</li>
         </ul>
         <p>
-        Priority 2 criteria for M8 are:
+          See the <a 
href="http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN/fixforversion/12312291";>
+          Woden JIRAs to be fixed for Version M8</a> for the remaining 
function planned for M8.
         </p>
-        <ul>
-            <li>Changes to the extension architecture deferred from M7</li>
-            <li>Any other outstanding API changes</li>
-        
-        </ul>
         <p>
-          See the <a href="http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/Woden";>Woden 
JIRAs</a> marked with Version M8 for a list of 
-          outstanding function planned for M8.
+        The JIRAs considered part of the release-defining criteria are:
         </p>
-        
         <ul>
-
-            <li>WSDL 2.0 Validation JIRAs (Priority 1):
-
-              <ul>
-                <li>WODEN-3 Add component name to Schema-0016 assertion 
message </li>
-                <li>WODEN-39 W3C WSDL2 tests should include assertions </li>
-                <li>WODEN-62 Adding an assertion check should be simple </li>
-                <li>WODEN-74 Missing QName resolution error for {interface 
fault} property of Interface </li>
-                <li>WODEN-103 Several binding assertion failures </li>
-                <li>WODEN-104 Several import/include assertion failures </li>
-                <li>WODEN-105 Several interface assertion failures </li>
-                <li>WODEN-106 Several types/schema assertions failures </li>
-                <li>WODEN-107 Several qname assertion failures </li>
-                <li>WODEN-122 Implement EBNF grammar for {http location} </li>
-                <li>WODEN-137 QName deserialization test fails on Sun Java 5 
JRE </li>
-                <li>WODEN-149 Use the new WSDL 2.0 assertion numbers <img 
src="../../images/ok.gif" height="10" width="10" alt="finished"/></li>
-              </ul>
-            </li>
-
-            <li>Other High Priority JIRAs (Priority 2):
-
-              <ul>
-                <li>WODEN-47 Extensions as generic collections </li>
-                <li>WODEN-56 Extensions API should not use *internal* classes 
</li>
-                <li>WODEN-84 Some internally defined constants should be on 
the API </li>
-                <li>WODEN-135 Element API, scope of interface and binding 
fault refs to include extended interfaces </li>
-                <li>WODEN-136 Message content model should not be represented 
in the Element API </li>
-                <li>WODEN-138 XML catalog should not need Java system 
properties </li>
-                <li>WODEN-141 DescriptionElement.getTypesElement() should not 
be a factory method </li>
-                <li>WODEN-142 &lt;documentation&gt; should not be wrapped as 
java.lang.Object </li>
-                <li>WODEN-147 Entity resolver needed </li>
-                <li>WODEN-151 WSDL4J license is missing in the release archive 
files </li>
-              </ul>
-            </li>
-
-            <li>Lower Priority JIRAs:
-
-              <ul>
-                <li>WODEN-32 toString() methods to aid debugging </li>
-                <li>WODEN-33 DocumentationElement should extend NestedElement 
<img src="../../images/ok.gif" height="10" width="10" alt="finished"/></li>
-                <li>WODEN-67 Modularize the build to separate the DOM and OM 
implementations </li>
-                <li>WODEN-115 Support wsdl:description nested within other XML 
documents </li>
-              </ul>
-            </li>
-
-        </ul> 
+          <li>WODEN-39 W3C WSDL2 tests should include assertions </li>
+          <li>WODEN-47 Extensions as generic collections </li>
+          <li>WODEN-56 Extensions API should not use *internal* classes </li>
+          <li>WODEN-62 Adding an assertion check should be simple </li>
+          <li>WODEN-74 Missing QName resolution error for {interface fault} 
property of Interface </li>
+          <li>WODEN-103 Several binding assertion failures </li>
+          <li>WODEN-104 Several import/include assertion failures </li>
+          <li>WODEN-105 Several interface assertion failures </li>
+          <li>WODEN-106 Several types/schema assertions failures </li>
+          <li>WODEN-107 Several qname assertion failures </li>
+          <li>WODEN-122 Implement EBNF grammar for {http location} </li>
+          <li>WODEN-157 SOAP binding reuse of HTTP properties </li>
+          <li>WODEN-158 SOAPBindingOperationExtensions does not have 
isHttpLocationIgnoreUncited </li>
+       </ul> 
    
     </section>
     <section>
-      <title>Woden 1.0 - Date is conditional upon graduation from 
incubation</title>
+      <title>Woden 1.0 - expected early 2008</title>
        <p>
-               The initial release of Woden will support DOM parsing and 
validation of WSDL 2.0
-               documents.
+               The 1.0 release of Woden will support DOM parsing and 
validation of WSDL 2.0
+               documents. The main objective of this release will be to 
deliver a stable Woden API.
+               That is, a committed API for future releases. User feedback 
from the milestone releases 
+               so far has resulted in ongoing improvements to the Woden API. 
Further work will be required
+               for the 1.0 release to agree the final API. 
+               Some <a 
href="http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Woden/APIReview";>API review issues</a>
+               have already been caputured on the Woden wiki.
        </p>
     </section> 
     <section>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to