Glen, I thought that one way we could faithfully represent WSDL 1.1 using the WDSL 2.0 component model would be to difference extensions to capture the differences. For example, in WSDL 2.0, all endpoints within a service implement the same interface. In WSDL 1.1 there is no such restriction. So we'd have to map a WSDL 1.1 service into one or more WSDL 2.0 services, but them link them together using an extension so when we serialize the model back into WSDL 1.1, we can get faithful roundtripping.
I recall that Matt Dufftler compiled a list of differences between WSDL 1.1 and WDSL 2.0 when he developed his WSDL 1.1 to WSDL 2.0 converter. Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 313-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-3831, TL 313-3831 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 313-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/10/2007 06:17 AM Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject Re: WSDL 1.1 Glen, we discussed a couple of ideas, but I think the one we settled on was to parse WSDL 1.1 documents into the WSDL 2.0 object model so that WSDL consumers (e.g. code generators) could use a single WSDL model. The converter contributed by Matt Duftler will form the basis for this. I don't think we planned to serialize WSDL 2.0 to 1.1 docs, but user requirements will determine how 1.1 is supported in Woden. Our future delivery plan is: Milestone 8 (Dec) - complete WSDL 2.0 assertions and improve support for user extensions/validation. 1.0 (early in 2008) - review and stabilize the API. Main remaining function (TBD whether 1.0 or later) - serialization, WSDL 1.1 support. regards, John Kaputin "Arthur Ryman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/12/2007 10:19:18: > Glen, > > It's still a goal of Woden to support both WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0. The > focus is on WSDL 2.0 now. What are your requirements for WSDL 1.1 > support? > > -- Arthur > > On Dec 6, 2007 10:58 PM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, o Wodenites: > > > > Question - is there still (as was once discussed) a plan to enable Woden > > to read/write WSDL 1.1 as well as 2.0? Or has that fallen by the wayside? > > > > Thanks, > > --Glen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
