Attendees: Lawrence Mandel, John Kaputin Minutes
1. Open Action Items - Lawrence Mandel 2008-04-29 - John will update the build publish information to include information about publishing Maven components. 2008-05-13 John: No update. Lawrence: The location for the maven repo is /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository and the distribution directory is /www/www.apache.org/dist/ws/woden, both on people.apache.org. 2008-06-03 John: No progress. 2008-06-24 John: No progress. I've been catching up with Woden issues. 2008-05-13 - John will close the M8 plan and create the M9 plan with July 15 as the target date. 2008-06-03 John: No progress. Lawrence: I closed M8 in Jira and rolled all the incomplete items into M9. 2008-06-24 John: No progress. I'll get on this now that I have my access back. 2. Milestone 9 (M9) - John/Lawrence John: No progress on M9 yet. Lawrence: Ditto. John: We originally talked about July for M9 but I don't know that we'll be able to get the work done by then. 3. Development Discussion - All John: There's been some activity on the mailing list. We need to keep on top of it. John: Jeff has suggested refactoring the Woden repository. I don't think we need to include java twice in the hierarchy but other wise I think his suggestion is good. One issue is there are some base classes that do not belong in OM or DOM. Should we create another jar or role it into one of the implementations? Lawrence: I think it would be best to keep common code out of the implementation modules. However I don't think we need an extra jar for this common code. John: We can just include the common code in each of the implementations. We will need to see how this works with the Maven build. Lawrence: Should we change the Ant build to be based off Maven? Ant can simply call off to Maven for the build. John: For now we should keep the Ant build in place. Lawrence: Agreed. John: There was a discussion about the user of equals in Woden. Arthur suggested adding a new method. Jeremy suggested some use cases all on the component model. Lawrence: Let's keep this discussion going in WODEN-211 [1]. John: Jeremy also brought up the two API vs one API issue again. I'll bring this discussion up again once we have time. Lawrence: Saminda raised an issue with Woden OSGi bundle. WODEN-210 [2] was opened for this. I'll follow up with Saminda. John: I need to follow up with Vikas about OM. I'll follow up this week. [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-211 [2]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-210 4. Other Business - All No other business raised. Thanks, Lawrence Mandel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
