Hi Lawrence , I'm happy to lead the release process for 0.9 release , but as you said I need some helps. This is the first time I'm going to handle a release process so there is a possibility to something go wrong , it would be great if you can closely inspect my works throughout the release process and provide comments as needed. At the moment I have to create a new build scripts, once I ready to start resale process I will inform you .
Thanks, On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Lawrence Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Sagara, > > I don't have time to manage the release process but would be happy to help > you through it if you'd like to give it a shot. John Kaputin has also > managed the Woden release process but afaik is tied up working on other > things at the moment and likely won't have time to lead the process for the > M9 release. > > Lawrence > > > > > > From: > Sagara Gunathunga <[email protected]> > To: > [email protected] > Date: 10/26/2009 12:46 PM > Subject: Re: Woden 1.0 Milestone 9 release > ------------------------------ > > > > > Sounds great ! We need a new Maven based build script for release process , > I will look in to this. > > BTW so far Lawrence manage the release process as the release manager . > Lawrence , do you have any time to manage this release ? > > If not any one have any other suggestions ? > > Thanks, > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Arthur Ryman > <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>> > wrote: > +1 > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Lawrence Mandel > <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>> > wrote: > > I agree that Woden is due for a release. +1 > > Lawrence > > > > From: Jeremy Hughes <*[email protected]* <[email protected]>> To: * > [email protected]* <[email protected]> Date: 10/22/2009 06:04 > AM Subject: Re: Woden 1.0 Milestone 9 release Sent by: * > [email protected]* <[email protected]> > > ------------------------------ > > > > +1 > > 2009/10/22 Sagara Gunathunga > <*[email protected]*<[email protected]> > >: > > Hi all, > > > > During the recent past we have introduced following features to Woden. > > > > 1.) Woden serialization feature based on both DOM and OM. > > 2.) WSDL2.0 components level equals method. > > 3.) Woden no longer depend on Xerces , possible to switch with any > > JAXP implementation. > > 4.) Woden logging strategy. > > 5.) Maven plugin for Woden WSDL converter > > 6.) New Maven friendly directory structure. > > > > > > Also other than above , after the milestone 8 release Woden team have > > resolved following JIRA issues. > > > > 1.) (WODEN-224) Dependencies should refactor among modules. > > 2.) (WODEN-208) Provide simple error message if user tries to parse > WSDL 1.1 > > 3.) (WODEN-182) Private QName class causes classloading issues > > 4.) (WODEN-57) Use ws-commons-java5 for QName class > > 5.) (WODEN-220) OMWSDLReader should support to read from WSDLSource. > > 6.) (WODEN-211) Refactor directory layout to be more Maven compliant > > 7.) (WODEN-170) mvn pom.xml to download test-suite.zip from W3C > > 8.) (WODEN-181) getInterfaceMessageReferenceElement() method > > required on BindingMessageReferenceElement > > 9.) (WODEN-74) Validation does not report a QName resolution error > > for the {interface fault} property of InterfaceFaultReference > > 10.) (WODEN-194) Change isSafety() method to isSafe() > > 11.) (WODEN-195) Improve formatting of messages with no message > parameters > > 12.) (WODEN-192) schemaLocation URI not resolved correctly using jar > files > > 13.) (WODEN-191) URISyntaxException in SimpleURIResolver when path > > contains spaces > > 14.) (WODEN-189) NPE when interface extension used with Element API > > 15.) (WODEN-179) Remove WSDLReader.readWSDL methods that take an > > ErrorHandler parameter > > 16.) (WODEN-178) DescriptionImpl methods addElementDeclaration and > > addTypeDefinition should not be public > > 17.) (WODEN-177) Share client-configurable objects across the Woden > > implementation > > 18.) (WODEN-176) Remove the setParentElement method from the API > > 19.) (WODEN-175) ImportElement and IncludeElement should extend > NestedElement > > 20.) (WODEN-173) Correct the WSDL object model implementation inheritance > > 21.) (WODEN-174) Include the prefix in QNames from the target namespace > > 22.) (WODEN-36) Maven build system for Woden > > > > > > > > IMO at this point we can think about Woden milestone 9 release, WDYT ? > > > > > > > > Thanks , > > > > > > -- > > Sagara Gunathunga > > > > Blog - *http://ssagara.blogspot.com* <http://ssagara.blogspot.com/> > > Web - > > *http://people.apache.org/~sagara/*<http://people.apache.org/%7Esagara/> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > *[email protected]*<[email protected]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > *[email protected]*<[email protected]> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > *[email protected]*<[email protected]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > *[email protected]*<[email protected]> > > > > > > > > -- > Sagara Gunathunga > > Blog - *http://ssagara.blogspot.com* <http://ssagara.blogspot.com/> > Web - *http://people.apache.org/~sagara/*<http://people.apache.org/%7Esagara/> > > -- Sagara Gunathunga Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
