On 3/22/11 12:23 PM, "Mike Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anticipated extensions: > - multiple signers on the same plaintext Would you be ok with multiple signers being sign(sign(plaintext)), rather than plaintext, signature, signature? That allows us to stick with a single signer in each operation, and not have to worry as much about canonicalization. -- Joe Hildebrand _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
