Okay, go with the former.
Paul
Scott Wilson wrote:
I'd opt for the former as it gives us the option of building Wookie
including additional Widgets, which may be useful.
Paul, Kris - any preferences?
On 5 Aug 2009, at 22:59, Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm playing with creating a widget to talk to the basecamp API (later
I will add code to work with my own projectAdmin app, but I may as
well do something with a wide user base first).
I've not set up a Wookie yet, instead I'm using the Opera browser to
test things. However, I'd like to get this code into svn, primarily so
that people who know widgets better than I do can keep an eye on what
I am doing. This raises a question, where should I put the code?
My intention is to create some ant scripts that will build and package
one or more of the widgets found in a widget source directory. We can
do it a number of ways, I'd suggest one of:
trunk -> wookie
trunk -> widgets -> ant.xml
trunk -> widgets -> widgetA -> ant.xml
trunk -> widgets -> widgetB -> ant.xml
or
wookie -> trunk
widgets -> trunk -> ant.xml
widgets -> trunk -> widgetA -> ant.xml
widgets -> trunk -> widgetB -> ant.xml
If the committers would like to indicate their preference then I will
provide a patch with my starter code (yes, I do have write access to
the repo, but I feel that mentors/champions should earn merit in the
project just like everyone else).
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
