Sent from my mobile device.
On 1 Sep 2009, at 17:20, Scott Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi everyone,
On a related note, I just got sent a link by Ernie at the LAMS
Foundation of their documentation on integrating Wookie with their
project:
http://wiki.lamsfoundation.org/display/lamsdocs/lawook10
(There's even a nice screencast there.)
This is a good example of a Wookie "plugin" (or whatever they're to
be called) that is owned and maintained by an external OSS project.
I think we should start to collect links to these kinds of
integrations and add them to the wiki - what does everyone else think?
Yes, there should be a list of such things. We also need to make sure
they track developments in Wookie. We can make their life easier by
carefully categorising things in the issue tracker
S
On 1 Sep 2009, at 11:16, Ross Gardler wrote:
2009/9/1 Scott Wilson <[email protected]>:
I've always found it a little confusing, but then any term I've
come up with
tends to have the same potential confusion (connector, module,
adapter...)
I see what you mean, lets try a little brainstorming.
- connector
- adapter
- embedder
- container
...
S
On 1 Sep 2009, at 07:39, Ross Gardler wrote:
I find the name "Wookie Plugin" to be confusing. I assume it is a
plugin for Wookie, when in fact it is a plugin to allow Wookie to
widgets to work in a third party tool (Moodle, Elgg etc.), that
is, it
is a plugin for the third party tool.
Does anyone else see this confusion? Should Wookie Plugins be
renamed?
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
