2009/9/2 Sylvain Wallez <[email protected]>: > Ross Gardler wrote: >> >> 2009/9/2 Sylvain Wallez <[email protected]>:
... >> There is already a separate requirement for minimum physical >> representation of the ASF at Barcamps: "Have a minimum representation >> from ASF (at least three Apache sessions per day) " >> >> There is not a similarly explicit requirement for MeetUps, I guess >> when I wrote the docs I felt that it was implicit that a MeetUp will >> have project folk present. Perhaps this should be made explicit with >> something like "Have a minimum representation of ASF committers (at >> least 4 active committers presenting)" >> > > Hmm... taken to the letter, your document doesn't specify if the 2 members > and 3 committers have to be different people. With Scott, Ate, Andrew and > you attending, this makes 3 members and 4 committers ;-) He He! maybe I should leave it like that since I'm in favour of fewer requirements for attendance on small events. However, I believe the intention is for 2 members + 2 distinct committers. > Now as I said, I'd be more than happy to review any material that will be > presented at the meetup. Great, thanks Sylvain. Your responsability is to the ASF as a whole rather than to Wookie. In short all you need to do is ensure nothing that is planned tp happen at the event is at odds with the ASF way of doing things. It's a really lightweight job in this case because it is a not-for-profit event and the sponsor is not for profit. The oversight roles are really there to stop companies taking advantage of the ASF brand for their own purposes and thus putting the ASF charitiable status at risk. Ross
