Kurosu a écrit :
> Kurosu a écrit :
>
>> I've spent some time "cleaning" the includes by using forward
>> declarations. This means that not all headers are automatically
>>
>
> In order to continue this, I'm thinking of using uint32_t instead of
> Uint32 in include/action.{cpp,h}. However, this is C99, and I'm not sure
> all environments (*BSD) have it included as automatically as for gnu
> systems.
C++ has been defined before C99, so it is not entirely compatible.
Anyway, it seems that you can force most of compilers to use C99
extensions to C. From what I have understood, we already use some
functions defined only in C99 such as std::isnan().
> The same would be done in graphic/polygon.h
>
> The reason is that SDL_stdinc.h isn't sufficient for windows, and
> therefore SDL.h is needed, bringing in a lot of includes only for
> integer type definitions.
>
> Should I do that (and risk breaking *BSD and maybe MacOSX) or do the
> SDL.h include ? I'd go with the first, and I'll go with it if I hear no
> complain within a week.
>
What do FreeBSD and Apple maintainer think about that ? Will they able
to continue to package in such case ?
Regards,
Matt (gentildemon)
_______________________________________________
Wormux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
