First this has been submitted when 3.0.1 was still a beta. It was ignored. Second, you should understand that when a beta is constructed, you still using most the core code that exists in the release version. By reporting that a bug exists in the release, you alert the developers that they are carrying a bug into the beta which may reproduce the same undesirable results or worse. When it comes to the core editting functions of the word processor, one would think that a developer would at least take the time to acknowledge the problem so that it CAN be corrected in the upcoming beta-later to be the update. I'm not a developer per se so I don't write code. I do understand the code and can recommend how it should be fixed. I'm already seeing development that doesn't understand the differences necessary in PHP version usage as related to Apache server software versions. Earlier versions of Apache like 1.333 won't react proply with PHP5 and cause errors. I also know sloppy code when I see it.

I have worked for one of the top developers of broadcast software for radio and television. The only time a developer seems to reply on a given bug is when they get insulted. So go back and take a look at yourselves. Idiot may be a bit harsh but it got your attention didn't it? I'm aware that you'll probably ignore the problem because you're insulted but that's childish. If you really develop for the love and not the money then, take pride in your work and produce functions that actually work as described.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Nickerson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] wp-testers Digest, Vol 68, Issue 6


If you were a real R&D tester then you'd understand the difference
between beta and release.  You're reporting an error in the release
version of the code to the beta tester's mailing list.  Why not submit a
trouble ticket in the appropriate place and turn down the name calling.
WP is open source, so maybe you could fix it and submit the fix instead
of trashing all of those who are working to provide this code for us to
use at no cost.

On 24/10/2010 3:29 PM, Administrator wrote:
You code junkies are always claiming this isn't for support.  You can
call it anything you want  but you don't really use it for that.  You
use these for supporting each others sloppy code and any little pet
addition that meets your fancy.  Those who actually TEST the software
and report problems and are ingnored.  Si I've got a really good
idea.  Why don't you guys make a wp-developers mailing list.  Maybe
those that picked up on the WordPress software will actually put
together a group for REAL testing of your software.  I have been a
real R&D tester with a 6 figure salary, so I know what I'm talking about.
 Quickly about the Internal Server Error.  It most probably has to do
with using fast graphics on a server.  Older version of Apache like
1.333 are still in use with major hosting sites.  Using fast graphics
with this slopped together code from wordpress will quite often cause
500 errors by causing the server to time out on you.  Also you may
want to read the install instructions regarding 3.01 if upgrading from
as opposed to installing fresh.
Hope that helps.  The rest of you idiots that are responsible for the
code for the core editor have really screwed it up.  You put an
automatic save in the software that is NOT configurable.  That
shouldn't be uncontrollable because it interferes with other
processes.  The proportional redisplay of media has been totally
broken and been reported and ignored.  Fix that stuff why don't cha.

----  Original  Message ----- From: "Matthew Mascioni"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] wp-testers Digest, Vol 68, Issue 6


500 Internal Server error when installing WordPress 3.0.1 on my
server, suggest look into it.

Best Regards,
Matthew Mascioni
Founder/CEO of App Inquirer
http://appinquirer.com


On 2010-10-23, at 8:00 AM, [email protected]
wrote:

Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
   [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
   [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: wp-testers Digest, Vol 68, Issue 5 (Mark Beihoffer)
  2. Mark Beihoffer has invited you to open a Google mail    account
     (Mark Beihoffer)
  3. Re: Mark Beihoffer has invited you to open a Google mail
     account (Rich Pedley)
  4. Re: Custom post type capabilities not fully set up on
     registration (Andrew Nacin)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:12:49 -0500
From: Mark Beihoffer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] wp-testers Digest, Vol 68, Issue 5
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
   <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

l tried that and it worked. Thants Jenni Jenni Jenni Jenni.

Mark Beihoffer
Dragonfly Networks
[email protected]
[email protected]
(612)508-5128


On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:00 AM,
<[email protected]>wrote:

Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
      [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
      http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
      [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
      [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."


Today's Topics:

 1. php and word press problems (Marvin Hunkin)
 2. Re: php and word press problems (John Blackbourn)
 3. Custom post type capabilities not fully set up on
    registration (Andrew Macaulay-Brook)
 4. Re: Custom post type capabilities not fully set up on
    registration (Andrew Nacin)
 5. Re: Custom post type capabilities not fully set up on
    registration (Andrew Macaulay-Brook)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:45:50 +1100
From: "Marvin Hunkin" <[email protected]>
Subject: [wp-testers] php and word press problems
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <2f2863d6f386428c92a68c12cfea4...@marvinpc>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"

?hi.
the person who sent me the code to turn on php.
cold they resend the code to me and the process to get it to
work.as lost
it
.
thank you.
marvin from australia.

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 04:19:09 +0100
From: John Blackbourn
<[email protected]<johnbillion%[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [wp-testers] php and word press problems
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
      <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Marvin, the wp-hackers mailing list isn't for support; it's for
discussion on WordPress hacking and core development of the platform.

The information you want is freely available on the web. Try Googling
for any phrase like "how to turn on php" and you'll get hundreds of
thousands of results.

Also, if you're struggling with setting up PHP you might be better off
going with a cheap shared host. There are some recommendations here:
http://wordpress.org/hosting/ .

John

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Marvin Hunkin
<[email protected]>
wrote:
?hi.
the person who sent me the code to turn on php.
cold they resend the code to me and the process to get it to
work.aslost it
?.
thank you.
marvin from australia.
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:08:46 +0100
From: Andrew Macaulay-Brook <[email protected]>
Subject: [wp-testers] Custom post type capabilities not fully set up
      on      registration
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=windows-1252

I can't work out whether this is covered by
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/14122 or not.

I'm using a custom post type called property, assigning
capabilities using
'capability_type' => 'property' and then giving my Editors
*_property and
*_propertys capabilities wherever I can see they already have
*_post or
*_posts.

The rationale for all this is that it lets me turn off all the
capabilities
for blog Posts, hiding the Posts menu for Editors, as this site
doesn't use
the blog.  I then give my client an Editor level login.

I'm mapping meta-capabilities using Justin Tadlock's code at
http://justintadlock.com/archives/2010/07/10/meta-capabilities-for-custom-post-types


Problem: Neither my clients, nor the Admin login can Trash custom
posts.

It seems that using the argument 'capability_type' => 'property'
only sets
up the following mappings in the post type object:

<!-- Capability mapping: stdClass Object
(
  [edit_post] => edit_property
  [edit_posts] => edit_propertys
  [edit_others_posts] => edit_others_propertys
  [publish_posts] => publish_propertys
  [read_post] => read_property
  [read_private_posts] => read_private_propertys
  [delete_post] => delete_property
)
-->

... which I generated using $post_type = get_post_type_object(
$post->post_type ); print_r($post_type->cap);

It looks like the mappings for $post_type->cap->delete_posts and
$post_type->cap->delete_others_posts aren't being set up.

I've got an issue with taxonomy capabilities too, but that's my
next job.

Andrew Macaulay-Brook, BEng MBCS CITP, trading as theburo.net
mailto:[email protected] ? http://www.theburo.net/



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 07:29:13 -0400
From: Andrew Nacin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Custom post type capabilities not fully set
      up on   registration
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:

<[email protected]<aanlktincxxjucdok-pw%[email protected]>


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Andrew Macaulay-Brook <[email protected]
wrote:

I can't work out whether this is covered by
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/14122 or not.

I'm using a custom post type called property, assigning capabilities
using
'capability_type' => 'property' and then giving my Editors
*_property and
*_propertys capabilities wherever I can see they already have
*_post or
*_posts.

The rationale for all this is that it lets me turn off all the
capabilities
for blog Posts, hiding the Posts menu for Editors, as this site
doesn't
use
the blog.  I then give my client an Editor level login.

I'm mapping meta-capabilities using Justin Tadlock's code at

http://justintadlock.com/archives/2010/07/10/meta-capabilities-for-custom-post-types


Problem: Neither my clients, nor the Admin login can Trash custom
posts.

It seems that using the argument 'capability_type' => 'property' only
sets
up the following mappings in the post type object:

<!-- Capability mapping: stdClass Object
(
  [edit_post] => edit_property
  [edit_posts] => edit_propertys
  [edit_others_posts] => edit_others_propertys
  [publish_posts] => publish_propertys
  [read_post] => read_property
  [read_private_posts] => read_private_propertys
  [delete_post] => delete_property
)
-->

... which I generated using $post_type = get_post_type_object(
$post->post_type ); print_r($post_type->cap);

It looks like the mappings for $post_type->cap->delete_posts and
$post_type->cap->delete_others_posts aren't being set up.


This is indeed the same ticket at issue.

If you read Justin's post again, you'll see that he deliberately
sets up
those additional capabilities by overloading what gets passed to the
capabilities array.

I haven't yet got around to committing my meta capabilities patch
for 3.1
yet, basically because after a few attempts I don't think I've
quite nailed
it yet.

But what you'll see is when map_meta_cap is true (a new flag for
register_post_type), then these additional capabilities will need
to be set
up, or WordPress will do it for you, based on capability_type.

Hope that makes sense.

Nacin


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:44:49 +0100
From: Andrew Macaulay-Brook <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Custom post type capabilities not fully set
      up on   registration
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=windows-1252

Thanks Andrew - depends on how literally you read Justin's post I
guess. I
read "I?ve also added in a couple of extra capabilities that were
not shown
in my previous tutorial on post types: delete_posts and
delete_others_posts." and didn't mentally add "because WordPress
doesn't do
it."  :-)

I'll use the overloading instead of being lazy and look out for the
patch -
is it looking definite for 3.1?

A.

On 21 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Andrew Nacin wrote:

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Andrew Macaulay-Brook
<[email protected]
wrote:

I can't work out whether this is covered by
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/14122 or not.

I'm using a custom post type called property, assigning capabilities
using
'capability_type' => 'property' and then giving my Editors
*_property
and
*_propertys capabilities wherever I can see they already have
*_post or
*_posts.

The rationale for all this is that it lets me turn off all the
capabilities
for blog Posts, hiding the Posts menu for Editors, as this site
doesn't
use
the blog.  I then give my client an Editor level login.

I'm mapping meta-capabilities using Justin Tadlock's code at

http://justintadlock.com/archives/2010/07/10/meta-capabilities-for-custom-post-types


Problem: Neither my clients, nor the Admin login can Trash custom
posts.

It seems that using the argument 'capability_type' => 'property'
only
sets
up the following mappings in the post type object:

<!-- Capability mapping: stdClass Object
(
 [edit_post] => edit_property
 [edit_posts] => edit_propertys
 [edit_others_posts] => edit_others_propertys
 [publish_posts] => publish_propertys
 [read_post] => read_property
 [read_private_posts] => read_private_propertys
 [delete_post] => delete_property
)
-->

... which I generated using $post_type = get_post_type_object(
$post->post_type ); print_r($post_type->cap);

It looks like the mappings for $post_type->cap->delete_posts and
$post_type->cap->delete_others_posts aren't being set up.


This is indeed the same ticket at issue.

If you read Justin's post again, you'll see that he deliberately
sets up
those additional capabilities by overloading what gets passed to the
capabilities array.

I haven't yet got around to committing my meta capabilities patch
for 3.1
yet, basically because after a few attempts I don't think I've quite
nailed
it yet.

But what you'll see is when map_meta_cap is true (a new flag for
register_post_type), then these additional capabilities will need
to be
set
up, or WordPress will do it for you, based on capability_type.

Hope that makes sense.

Nacin
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

Andrew Macaulay-Brook, BEng MBCS CITP, trading as theburo.net
mailto:[email protected] ? http://www.theburo.net/



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


End of wp-testers Digest, Vol 68, Issue 5
*****************************************



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:57:58 -0500
From: Mark Beihoffer <[email protected]>
Subject: [wp-testers] Mark Beihoffer has invited you to open a Google
   mail    account
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
   <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out.
Here's an
invitation to create an account.


 You're Invited to Gmail!

Mark Beihoffer has invited you to open a Gmail account.

Gmail is Google's free email service, built on the idea that email
can be
intuitive, efficient, and fun. Gmail has:

*Less spam*
Keep unwanted messages out of your inbox with Google's innovative
technology.

*Lots of space*
Enough storage so that you'll never have to delete another message.

*Built-in chat*
Text or video chat with Mark Beihoffer and other friends in real time.

*Mobile access*
Get your email anywhere with Gmail on your mobile phone.

You can even import your contacts and email from Yahoo!, Hotmail,
AOL, or
any other web mail or POP accounts.

Once you create your account, Mark Beihoffer will be notified of
your new
Gmail address so you can stay in touch. Learn
more<http://mail.google.com/mail/help/intl/en/about.html>or get
started<http://mail.google.com/mail/a-273fae0330-d2c0d5bcec-wZxYlk-EFZypE67MHnxHLWmT-mY>

!
       Sign
up<http://mail.google.com/mail/a-273fae0330-d2c0d5bcec-wZxYlk-EFZypE67MHnxHLWmT-mY>

Google Inc. | 1600 Ampitheatre Parkway | Mountain View, California
94043


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:19:55 +0100
From: Rich Pedley <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Mark Beihoffer has invited you to open a
   Google mail    account
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 22/10/2010 13:57, Mark Beihoffer wrote:
I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out.
Here's an
invitation to create an account.


  You're Invited to Gmail!

Mark Beihoffer has invited you to open a Gmail account.

Gmail is Google's free email service, built on the idea that email
can be
intuitive, efficient, and fun. Gmail has:

 *Less spam*
Keep unwanted messages out of your inbox with Google's innovative
technology.

oh the irony.

Rich


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:50:21 -0400
From: Andrew Nacin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Custom post type capabilities not fully set
   up on    registration
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
   <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Andrew Macaulay-Brook
<[email protected]>wrote:

Thanks Andrew - depends on how literally you read Justin's post I
guess. I
read "I?ve also added in a couple of extra capabilities that were
not shown
in my previous tutorial on post types: delete_posts and
delete_others_posts." and didn't mentally add "because WordPress
doesn't do
it."  :-)

I'll use the overloading instead of being lazy and look out for the
patch -
is it looking definite for 3.1?


Yes. This conversation got me looking at things again. Here's the
ticket:
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/14122. The first pass was
committed
yesterday, so you'll see this in 3.1. Please test it if you can to
find any
bugs or limitations.


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


End of wp-testers Digest, Vol 68, Issue 6
*****************************************
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

Reply via email to