Falko Trojahn wrote: > Hi all, > > in short: > I've tried to find a solution for that: if one of the split package > files has incorrect syntax, whole wpkg process is broken. I made a > patch for this (see bottom).
Thanks for it. This split thing is a nice thing, with your patch would be even "safer". (...) > But if I rename the 2nd package e.g. to firefox-ext-webdevelop > (could be an writing error, hence) this package is instantly removed. > > _Is this really intended behaviour?_ > > I think, the following would be smoother/more correct: > > Provided that a host is assigned to a profile, a package is included > in this profile, and the package is installed on a workstation. > If in this situation the package disappears, but the > host/profile/package assignement is intact, wpkg should assume an > error and should _not_ remove this package! > > What do you mean? I wouldn't like to wake up one morning with > hundred's of workstations without office ;-) Actually, something similar happend to me once :) You're totally right. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wpkg-users
