to emphasize Tim's desire for reduced scope, I am thinking that during the generation of a set of BCPs, if we find glaring holes in what's going on, then the group could be re-chartered to address and document use-cases and new requirements.
Randy On Aug 28, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Jon Callas wrote: > > On Aug 28, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > >> >> So in addition, I was hoping this group would document >> use-cases and requirements for new protocols or changes >> to current protocols if the wg figure some are needed >> so that we could spin-up short-lived SEC or other WGs >> as needed. > > I think that is *precisely* one of the things this group should be doing. > > As we've noted Web PKI isn't precisely what -- umm, what's the correct > back-formation? -- orthodox PKI? -- is. Those deltas cam out of real-world > use cases that had real-world requirements. It's best to discuss them along > with the use cases because the use cases are the whys. > > Jon > > _______________________________________________ > wpkops mailing list > wpkops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops > _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list wpkops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
